[theqoo] SIMPLE SUMMARY OF THE COURT RULING FOR NEWJEANS

1. NewJeans: We will terminate our contract with Ador.
   → Court: There is no significant reason that appears to justify contract termination.

2. NewJeans: Dismissing CEO Min Heejin is a serious violation of management.
   → Court: This was a decision made based on Ador's business judgment, and there is nothing in the contract that mandates CEO Min must be in charge of production.

3. NewJeans: Allegations of plagiarism of "ILLIT," and a comment by a HYBE employee saying, "Ignore Hanni."
   → Court: These issues have not been substantiated enough to be considered grounds for contract termination.

4. NewJeans: Ador ruined the collaborative relationship with the advertising agency "Dolphiners."
   → Court: Dolphiners are not a party to this case, and even if there was a dispute between them and Ador, it is difficult to see this as grounds for contract termination.

5. NewJeans: Ador neglected management after dismissing CEO Min.
   → Court: Your unilateral notification of contract termination also affected management operations.

6. NewJeans: We will independently work as NJZ, separate from Ador.
   → Court: This is not possible.

7. NewJeans: Then, what would be recognized as grounds for contract termination?
   → Court: There are none. On the contrary, Ador took the risk of failure and invested heavily in you from the time you were a trainee, fulfilling their settlement obligations. Demanding unilateral contract termination just two years after success would cause significant damage to them.

original post: here

1. That #5 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ

2. So they're the 2nd FIFTY FIFTY 

3. I just feel bad for them 

4. They should just continue as NewJeans and keep using Min Heejin's songs 

5. Ah their reasons are so... ㅠㅠ

6. This is insaneㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ

7. What's up with #4? ㅋㅋㅋㅋ That's so nonsense

8. Aigo seriously what are they gonna do?

9. They're now New-Jings (t/n: NewJings = jinging = whine) 

10. The ruling is obivious

New post

Next Post

✉ PC Stories