[instiz] RANKING #1 ON COLLEGE ENTRANCE EXAM VS RANKING #1 ON SURVIVAL SHOW, WHICH ONE IS HARDER?

Yet there's someone like this in real life who achieved both

original post: here

1. #2. For #1, you can study freaking hard and you'll be able to get close to that point, where as for #2, it's not only based on your effort, if you're simply talented but the camera never films you, what are you gonna do...? If you're talented but ugly,  you won't get any fans, it's overall harder because so much is up to your own luck... For SAT exams, you can somewhat judge your overall score based on your mock exams, but there's nothing you can use as an indicator of how well you can do on a survival show, all you need is to dump all your luck into it 

2. #1 in SAT...The number of competitors is way higher in the first place

3. Of course SAT is harder

4. Of course #1... Do you now what kind of life a #1 of SAT is leading right now... And for the really talented people, before entering a survival show, they're already cast somewhere

5. If you just look at your competition, it's #1

6. #2, SAT is all about putting in as much effort as you can by yourself. As for survival show, there's nothing set in stone no matter how talented you are

7. #1's competitive rate is different ㅋ

8. Let's as Zhang Hao, he's #1 in both!ㅋ

9. Hao-nim..

10. The hardest is the SAT but at the same time, survival is too dependent on luck

New post

Next Post

✉ PC Stories